{"id":9290,"date":"2019-07-30T12:42:18","date_gmt":"2019-07-30T15:42:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.mindthegraph.com\/?p=9290"},"modified":"2022-10-18T08:23:31","modified_gmt":"2022-10-18T11:23:31","slug":"climate-change-science","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/klimaendringer-vitenskap\/","title":{"rendered":"Nye vitenskapelige data stopper klimafornekterne"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Climate change is being a controversial subject these days. We can see all over social media denial and skeptic people. However, every day scientists come up with new data raising awareness about the consequences of our habits. But, humans are really causing global warming? According to science, yes. Now, three studies published on Nature this month show that\u00a0scientific consensus is likely to have passed 99%.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Et argument som brukes av klimaendringsfornektere, er ideen om at jorden allerede har opplevd lignende dramatiske topper og bunner tidligere. To eksempler er den lille istiden og middelalderens klimaanomali. S\u00e5 skiftene skjer p\u00e5 grunn av en naturlig syklus. De nye studiene tyder imidlertid p\u00e5 at ingen av disse skiftene fant sted p\u00e5 hele planeten i samme periode. Dessuten er den n\u00e5v\u00e6rende klimaendringsprosessen raskere enn noen annen tidligere.<\/p>\n<p><center><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Temperaturavvik sortert etter land fra 1900 - 2016\" width=\"800\" height=\"600\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/K4Ra2HR27pQ?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><\/center><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Forskerne brukte rekonstruksjoner basert p\u00e5 700 proxy-registreringer av temperaturendringer, som tr\u00e6r, is og sedimenter, fra alle kontinenter.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Mark Maslin, professor i klimatologi ved University College London, ble intervjuet i et intervju <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/science\/2019\/jul\/24\/scientific-consensus-on-humans-causing-global-warming-passes-99?CMP=twt_a-environment_b-gdneco\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">av The Guardian<\/a>. Han sa at\u00a0<em>\"Denne artikkelen b\u00f8r endelig f\u00e5 klimafornektere til \u00e5 slutte \u00e5 hevde at den nylige observerte sammenhengende globale oppvarmingen er en del av en naturlig klimasyklus.<\/em> This paper shows the truly stark difference between regional and localised changes in climate of the past and the truly global effect of anthropogenic greenhouse emissions\u201d.<\/p>\n<h2 style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Hva de nye rapportene om klimaendringer sier<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-019-1401-2.epdf?referrer_access_token=eSxmUpIl3PCVr9z9B-uQONRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0OFAuvUf3smNPgQh_x6w3tkX-JXRoLf0zBLgBVwxe-KoifRXttIDrQhrrp5_VtNZW2aWM2B673VXec5tmT2AV5TfK-obK6R4EwVqorcNs0p3XR7sKS4MgC2Am9TtwfB8mtEFAlGvQAa-_oYCqo5YZTToEiJ_j61ob5j4HErGyOxjp3TMClkhY2m8CgwnNLW_rl7ctGLlwyONosojhdTgsbGCetHala0Dvo4q1sGW3ZnY39t8ymDta83jcdsfVrY8KArjDUwZMxB5sEIc_Xud66eV_ok9lRGm6bTFM6plSLkDj3NSoXpOZdw8H_2uEOIov8%3D&amp;tracking_referrer=www.mindthegraph.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Ingen bevis for globalt sammenhengende varme- og kuldeperioder i den f\u00f8rindustrielle fellestiden<\/a>\u00a0indikerer at det tidligere ikke skjedde temperaturendringer p\u00e5 mer enn halvparten av kloden til enhver tid.<\/h3>\n<p>They studied the Little Ice Age,\u00a0the coldest epoch of the last millennium. The results indicate that\u00a0the coldest temperatures occurred during different centuries around the world. It took place during the\u00a015th century in the central and eastern Pacific Ocean, during the 17th century in northwestern Europe and southeastern North America. However, the\u00a0remaining regions\u00a0experienced\u00a0the coldest temperatures only during the mid\u00a019th century.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Det betyr at den romlige sammenhengen eksisterer i l\u00f8pet av den f\u00f8rindustrielle tidsalderen.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Dette stemmer overens med den romlige sammenhengen i stokastiske klimavariasjoner. <em>&#8220;This lack of spatiotemporal coherence indicates that preindustrial forcing was not sufficient to produce globally extreme temperatures at multidecadal and centennial timescales. By contrast, we find that the warmest period of the past two millennia occurred during the 2oth century for more than 98% of the globe. This provides strong evidence that anthropogenic global warming is not only unparalleled in terms of absolute temperatures, but also unprecedented in spatial consistency within the context of the past 2,000 years.&#8221;<\/em><\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41561-019-0402-y.epdf?referrer_access_token=NsmsvMEmWm6SoIVKCTcEt9RgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0MyBnoX34ZRaon0wmYjK2GXR3LOpEGlJAGIl2yZr9fKQYQkJni28mFZ38_k7tJ5vkJDciMdvmfN_MId2508iWfSpShftbeoK2cY-NpTXIO-SkgjBJJBVOz_OlG4EcQUBuq1YuGeTaVZ9zND91dE_ap7Om7rfyUcIwvYWGEqN12MEN2JrF6V_Tgkq14lTQX_Z0ft7W5TbcMDh8tS8823jWdGooSvS90xoQ30TVgF2fLu0sLNUZ7M5IdM_98hjl53eUZX85rxKMQv1pmpBc7Gl4RCqw_rtGdPCwNq9Mi_ECopCi6G4JUrqOk_73ejPNW6IGE%3D&amp;tracking_referrer=www.mindthegraph.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Siste fase av den lille istid tvunget frem av vulkanutbrudd<\/a>\u00a0forklare de sterke globale svingningene i f\u00f8rste halvdel av 1700-tallet.<\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Forskerne forklarer hvordan verden begynte \u00e5 bevege seg fra en vulkansk nedkj\u00f8lt tid til et klima som ble varmet opp av menneskelige utslipp i l\u00f8pet av 1700-tallet. <em>\"I l\u00f8pet av f\u00f8rste halvdel av 1800-tallet skjedde det flere store tropiske vulkanutbrudd i l\u00f8pet av mindre enn tre ti\u00e5r.<\/em> [...] F\u00f8rst etter 1850-\u00e5rene startet overgangen til perioden med menneskeskapt oppvarming. Vi konkluderer med at slutten av den lille istiden var preget av en rekke vulkanutbrudd, noe som gj\u00f8r det vanskelig \u00e5 definere en enkelt f\u00f8rindustriell basislinje.\"<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41561-019-0400-0.epdf?referrer_access_token=9WnEgnP4ArzQHs_nJLEdTtRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0N7bTxBqLecWapiK43Tv3o5PzlP3yU4M1aQfVsGAWcU8hAbkMnJvoUiH886GbPMiVe022ISWAeoChP3Qq_Gt6jprCUM4W5-EMoYm56z1CGLQknj0EOohqgyidLWgHd7vTsA9QxQZmVSdY7eKCMbQIaUoHgIuis5f9NC33YpNXHVtKKf_nibHrvR7qfxeGX86RT62iPdIw91FmkgAWGycr820GFOI6EqEqIAuqiAtDeVBfntpWE9dTDWx8WB1oYgogiadIU8epNmvJsNJJ9LRqSHHMSyhLDyrPRBn5Ga8PjqRajuBhRp72rIeHLaoHvDKJk%3D&amp;tracking_referrer=www.mindthegraph.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Konsistente multidekadiske variasjoner i rekonstruksjoner og simuleringer av global temperatur i l\u00f8pet av v\u00e5r felles tidsregning.<\/a>\u00a0viser hvordan temperatur\u00f8kningen siden slutten av 1900-tallet har v\u00e6rt den raskeste de siste to \u00e5rtusener.<\/h3>\n<p>I denne studien presenterer forfatterne <em>2000 \u00e5r lange rekonstruksjoner av den globale middeltemperaturen ved hjelp av syv ulike statistiske metoder som bygger p\u00e5 en global samling av temperaturf\u00f8lsomme paleoklimatiske registreringer.<\/em> Resultatene tyder p\u00e5 at <em>de st\u00f8rste oppvarmingstrendene p\u00e5 tidsskalaer p\u00e5 20 \u00e5r og lengre forekommer i andre halvdel av det tjuende \u00e5rhundre, noe som understreker den uvanlige karakteren av oppvarmingen de siste ti\u00e5rene.<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">As the article published on The Guardian explains, previous studies have shown near unanimity among climate scientists that human factors \u2013 car exhausts, factory chimneys, forest clearance and other sources of greenhouse gases \u2013 are responsible for the exceptional level of global warming.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Denne infografikken er nyttig for \u00e5 forst\u00e5 drivhuseffekten:<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.mindthegraph.com\/carbon-cycle-greenhouse-effect\/#.XUCSVehKj4Y\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-9299\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.mindthegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/greenhouse-image-3.png\" alt=\"preview_88000-1024x862\" width=\"850\" height=\"716\" srcset=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/greenhouse-image-3.png 1024w, https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/greenhouse-image-3-300x253.png 300w, https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/greenhouse-image-3-768x647.png 768w, https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/greenhouse-image-3-14x12.png 14w, https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/greenhouse-image-3-100x84.png 100w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 850px) 100vw, 850px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.mindthegraph.com\/carbon-cycle-greenhouse-effect\/#.XUCSVehKj4Y\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-9300\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.mindthegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/greenhouse-image-2.png\" alt=\"preview_88004-1024x943\" width=\"850\" height=\"783\" srcset=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/greenhouse-image-2.png 1024w, https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/greenhouse-image-2-300x276.png 300w, https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/greenhouse-image-2-768x707.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 850px) 100vw, 850px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Du kan lese mer om det p\u00e5:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.mindthegraph.com\/carbon-cycle-greenhouse-effect\/#.XUCSVehKj4Y\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Karbonsyklus og drivhuseffekt - en vitenskapelig infografikk<\/a><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.mindthegraph.com\/ocean-acidification-consequences\/#.XUCSTOhKj4Y\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Konsekvenser av havforsuring p\u00e5 marine dyr<\/a><\/li>\n<li style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.mindthegraph.com\/scientific-communication-2\/#.XUCUv-hKj4Y\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Er artikkelen din klar for fremtiden? Sosiale medier har ogs\u00e5 plass til vitenskapelig kommunikasjon.<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">N\u00e5 m\u00e5 vi \u00f8ke bevisstheten om konsekvensene av klimaendringene. \u00c5 snakke med folk om og pr\u00f8ve \u00e5 redusere v\u00e5r p\u00e5virkning er m\u00e5ter \u00e5 gj\u00f8re noe p\u00e5. Hva gj\u00f8r vi som forskere?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-6577\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.mindthegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/start_get-mind-the-graph-medical-illustrations.png\" alt=\"tenk p\u00e5 grafen vitenskapelige illustrasjoner\" width=\"180\" height=\"58\" srcset=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/start_get-mind-the-graph-medical-illustrations.png 310w, https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/start_get-mind-the-graph-medical-illustrations-300x97.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 180px) 100vw, 180px\" \/><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Klimaendringer er et kontroversielt tema om dagen. Overalt i sosiale medier ser vi fornektelse og skeptikere. Men hver dag kommer forskerne med nye data som \u00f8ker bevisstheten om konsekvensene av v\u00e5re vaner. Men er det virkelig mennesker som for\u00e5rsaker global oppvarming? If\u00f8lge vitenskapen, ja. Tre studier publisert i Nature i dag [...].<\/p>","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":9305,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"image","meta":[],"categories":[959,28],"tags":[302,160,219,161,51,554,775],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v19.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>New scientific data stops climate change deniers - Mind the Graph Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/nauka-o-zmianach-klimatu\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"nb_NO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"New scientific data stops climate change deniers - Mind the Graph Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Climate change is being a controversial subject these days. We can see all over social media denial and skeptic people. However, every day scientists come up with new data raising awareness about the consequences of our habits. But, humans are really causing global warming? According to science, yes. Now, three studies published on Nature this [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/nauka-o-zmianach-klimatu\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mind the Graph Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-07-30T15:42:18+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-10-18T11:23:31+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/105532277_nasa1.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"660\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"371\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Fabiola Soares\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Fabiola Soares\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"New scientific data stops climate change deniers - Mind the Graph Blog","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/nauka-o-zmianach-klimatu\/","og_locale":"nb_NO","og_type":"article","og_title":"New scientific data stops climate change deniers - Mind the Graph Blog","og_description":"Climate change is being a controversial subject these days. We can see all over social media denial and skeptic people. However, every day scientists come up with new data raising awareness about the consequences of our habits. But, humans are really causing global warming? According to science, yes. Now, three studies published on Nature this [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/nauka-o-zmianach-klimatu\/","og_site_name":"Mind the Graph Blog","article_published_time":"2019-07-30T15:42:18+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-10-18T11:23:31+00:00","og_image":[{"width":660,"height":371,"url":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/07\/105532277_nasa1.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Fabiola Soares","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Fabiola Soares","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/pl\/nauka-o-zmianach-klimatu\/","url":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/pl\/nauka-o-zmianach-klimatu\/","name":"New scientific data stops climate change deniers - Mind the Graph Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-07-30T15:42:18+00:00","dateModified":"2022-10-18T11:23:31+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/5592c012d89648325be9b0f3c3f91132"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/pl\/nauka-o-zmianach-klimatu\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"nb-NO","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/pl\/nauka-o-zmianach-klimatu\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/pl\/nauka-o-zmianach-klimatu\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"New scientific data stops climate change deniers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/","name":"Mind the Graph Blog","description":"Your science can be beautiful!","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"nb-NO"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/5592c012d89648325be9b0f3c3f91132","name":"Fabiola Soares","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"nb-NO","@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7dca2c6a766aff1db898cc74c18284d8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7dca2c6a766aff1db898cc74c18284d8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Fabiola Soares"},"url":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/author\/fabiola\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9290"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9290"}],"version-history":[{"count":18,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9290\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23427,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9290\/revisions\/23427"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9305"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9290"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9290"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9290"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}