{"id":25828,"date":"2022-12-06T11:30:00","date_gmt":"2022-12-06T14:30:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/?p=25828"},"modified":"2022-12-21T15:13:21","modified_gmt":"2022-12-21T18:13:21","slug":"methodological-flaws-in-research","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/metodiske-feil-i-forskningen\/","title":{"rendered":"Metodiske feil i forskningen"},"content":{"rendered":"

A research paper’s flaws are often hard to detect. Usually, it’s easy to spot errors in a blurry abstract with little focus and no data, but sometimes it can be more difficult. Good news: there’s a pretty simple solution. When peer-reviewing papers, it is important to understand how to spot an error, how to identify it, and to what extent the flaw is.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It is possible for flawed research methodologies to result in misleading data. If the methodology is not considered carefully, there are many ways in which research might be conducted incorrectly. Our list is not limited to these, but we will review some of the more common ones.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Hva er de metodiske feilene i forskningen?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

Innenfor alle fagfelt gjennomf\u00f8res det ulike typer studier, noe som resulterer i ulike typer forskningsfeil. Som et utgangspunkt kan denne listen v\u00e6re nyttig for \u00e5 forebygge vanlige feil i manuskripter. Med \u00f8velse og ferdigheter i \u00e5 lese manuskripter kritisk, kan listen utvides med mer spesifikke eksempler.\u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Du kan lese artikkelen v\u00e5r for \u00e5 l\u00e6re mer om forskningsmetodikk<\/a>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

    \n
  1. Using the wrong research design<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

    Forskningsdesignet er avgj\u00f8rende for \u00e5 oppn\u00e5 gyldige, vitenskapelig holdbare resultater. Sett deg inn i terminologien som gjelder for forskningsomr\u00e5det. Tenk over hvordan en uvanlig tiln\u00e6rming kan p\u00e5virke data og analyse hvis du st\u00f8ter p\u00e5 den i en studie. V\u00e6r oppmerksom p\u00e5 forskernes argumenter og begrunnelser. Noe nytt og ukjent er ikke n\u00f8dvendigvis un\u00f8yaktig eller mangelfullt. Det trenger bare mer oppmerksomhet under vurderingsprosessen.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

      \n
    1. Valg av st\u00f8rrelse for pr\u00f8ver<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

      I noen tilfeller er resultatene hentet fra et utvalg som er for lite til \u00e5 gi en n\u00f8yaktig analyse. Data fra virkeligheten krever litt innsikt n\u00e5r vi analyserer dem. Avhengig av situasjonen kan det ene scenariet v\u00e6re gyldig, mens det andre kanskje ikke er det. N\u00e5r man analyserer data, m\u00e5 man derfor ta hensyn til st\u00f8rrelsen p\u00e5 utvalget og hvorvidt det omfatter hele demografien. Sm\u00e5 utvalg kan ikke analyseres ved hjelp av prosentandeler; absolutte tall m\u00e5 alltid vises.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

        \n
      1. Metoder\/standarder som ikke er fulgt<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

        An explanation of how the results were produced should be included in the methods section. If you have questions about the validity of the figures, you should raise them. Examine the researchers’ justification carefully for any anomalies, in order to ask more questions if necessary. The use of irrelevant language, biased statements, and opinionated discourse during a study is also considered poor practice.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

          \n
        1. Ord i massevis<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

          For mange ord er et vanlig problem i manuskripter. S\u00e5 langt det er mulig, b\u00f8r du s\u00f8rge for at teksten er kortfattet, oversiktlig og slagkraftig. En leser kan miste interessen for en forskningsartikkel hvis den er for ordrik, noe som kan f\u00f8re til feiltolkninger. Slike feil forekommer av og til i mangel av erfaring, men det er viktig \u00e5 unng\u00e5 sp\u00f8rsm\u00e5l som ofte er konstruert p\u00e5 en slik m\u00e5te at resultatene blir skjeve. En forskningsstudie med et nytt sp\u00f8rreskjema er den eneste m\u00e5ten \u00e5 l\u00f8se denne feilen p\u00e5, i motsetning til andre typer feil.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            \n
          1. Konkluderende bevis er ikke tilstrekkelig<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n

            Det er viktig at sammendraget og konklusjonen i en forskningsartikkel er evidensbasert og begrunnet. Det kan v\u00e6re et problem med forskernes metodiske tiln\u00e6rming, flere referanser eller behov for ytterligere data som ikke stemmer overens med resultatene.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            Med verdens st\u00f8rste samling av vitenskapelig n\u00f8yaktige illustrasjoner<\/h2>\n\n\n\n

            Yes, you read that correctly. With Mind the Graph, you can communicate science in the best way possible by using scientific illustrations that illustrate a wide range of fields. Make sure you check out our gallery, which is regularly updated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

            <\/div>\n\n\n
            \n
            \"\"<\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n
            <\/div>\n\n\n\n
            \n
            \u00d8ke forskningen min med illustrasjoner<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n
            <\/div>\n\n\n\n
            <\/div>\n\n\n\n

            <\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

            Det er ofte vanskelig \u00e5 oppdage feilene i en forskningsartikkel. I denne artikkelen kan du lese om ulike typer feil og hvordan du kan unng\u00e5 dem i forskningsarbeidet ditt.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":27,"featured_media":25830,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[959,28],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"\nMethodological flaws in research<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A research paper's flaws are often hard to detect. Learn in this article the different types of them and how to avoid them in your research.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/metodiske-feil-i-forskningen\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"nb_NO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Methodological flaws in research\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A research paper's flaws are often hard to detect. Learn in this article the different types of them and how to avoid them in your research.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/metodiske-feil-i-forskningen\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mind the Graph Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2022-12-06T14:30:00+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2022-12-21T18:13:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/blog.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1124\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"613\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Aayushi Zaveri\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Methodological flaws in research\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"A research paper's flaws are often hard to detect. Learn in this article the different types of them and how to avoid them in your research.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/blog.png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Aayushi Zaveri\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Methodological flaws in research","description":"A research paper's flaws are often hard to detect. Learn in this article the different types of them and how to avoid them in your research.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/metodiske-feil-i-forskningen\/","og_locale":"nb_NO","og_type":"article","og_title":"Methodological flaws in research","og_description":"A research paper's flaws are often hard to detect. Learn in this article the different types of them and how to avoid them in your research.","og_url":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/metodiske-feil-i-forskningen\/","og_site_name":"Mind the Graph Blog","article_published_time":"2022-12-06T14:30:00+00:00","article_modified_time":"2022-12-21T18:13:21+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1124,"height":613,"url":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/blog.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Aayushi Zaveri","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"Methodological flaws in research","twitter_description":"A research paper's flaws are often hard to detect. Learn in this article the different types of them and how to avoid them in your research.","twitter_image":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/12\/blog.png","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Aayushi Zaveri","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/methodological-flaws-in-research\/","url":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/methodological-flaws-in-research\/","name":"Methodological flaws in research","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2022-12-06T14:30:00+00:00","dateModified":"2022-12-21T18:13:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/bbd0a706ff2842e8aff298830658ddbd"},"description":"A research paper's flaws are often hard to detect. Learn in this article the different types of them and how to avoid them in your research.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/methodological-flaws-in-research\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"nb-NO","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/methodological-flaws-in-research\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/methodological-flaws-in-research\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Methodological flaws in research"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/","name":"Mind the Graph Blog","description":"Your science can be beautiful!","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"nb-NO"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/bbd0a706ff2842e8aff298830658ddbd","name":"Aayushi Zaveri","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"nb-NO","@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b2a0d532f6fba932612a6cef1fc289c0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b2a0d532f6fba932612a6cef1fc289c0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Aayushi Zaveri"},"description":"Aayushi Zaveri majored in biotechnology engineering. She is currently pursuing a master's degree in Bioentrepreneurship from Karolinska Institute. She is interested in health and diseases, global health, socioeconomic development, and women's health. As a science enthusiast, she is keen in learning more about the scientific world and wants to play a part in making a difference.","sameAs":["http:\/\/linkedin.com\/in\/aayushizaveri"],"url":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/author\/aayuyshi\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25828"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/27"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=25828"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25828\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":25839,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/25828\/revisions\/25839"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/25830"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=25828"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=25828"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=25828"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}