{"id":10466,"date":"2019-09-30T14:01:52","date_gmt":"2019-09-30T17:01:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blog.mindthegraph.com\/?p=10466"},"modified":"2024-06-25T10:49:42","modified_gmt":"2024-06-25T13:49:42","slug":"climate-change-scientific-data","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/klimaendringer-vitenskapelige-data\/","title":{"rendered":"Avmystifisering av klimaendringene ved hjelp av vitenskapelige data"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Klimaendringer er fortsatt et kontroversielt tema. Noen ganger forsvinner vitenskapelige bevis til fordel for personlige meninger og polemiske samtaler. Vi mener at enhver diskusjon om klimaendringer m\u00e5 baseres p\u00e5 det vi allerede vet som samfunn, basert p\u00e5 vitenskap. Derfor inneholder dette innlegget mange lenker til vitenskapelige artikler, intervjuer med forskere og solide data. Hvis du er i tvil om noe av det du finner nedenfor, jobber vitenskapen for \u00e5 gi deg svar:<\/p>\n<h2><strong>01. Det er kaldt. Global oppvarming skjer ikke.<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Det er sn\u00f8 om vinteren. Dette faktum fungerer noen ganger som et argument mot global oppvarming. I 2015 tok en amerikansk senator med seg en sn\u00f8ball til Senatet for \u00e5 \"bevise\" at global oppvarming er en l\u00f8gn.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_10476\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-10476\" style=\"width: 590px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/slate.com\/technology\/2015\/03\/political-anti-science-a-week-of-nonsense.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-10476 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.mindthegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/50959594-1829-4fcc-8d0f-4fc6dbf3690f.jpg\" alt=\"50959594-1829-4fcc-8d0f-4fc6dbf3690f\" width=\"590\" height=\"414\" srcset=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/50959594-1829-4fcc-8d0f-4fc6dbf3690f.jpg 590w, https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/50959594-1829-4fcc-8d0f-4fc6dbf3690f-300x211.jpg 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 590px) 100vw, 590px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-10476\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">En amerikansk senator tok med seg en sn\u00f8ball til Senatet for \u00e5 \"bevise\" at global oppvarming er en l\u00f8gn.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Navnet kan faktisk v\u00e6re litt forvirrende, men sn\u00f8en er IKKE et bevis mot global oppvarming. Faktisk er ekstreme temperaturer et sterkt bevis p\u00e5 at ting er i endring. Vi er i ferd med \u00e5 miste de milde temperaturene. Det finnes rikelig med vitenskapelige data som viser hvordan temperaturen p\u00e5 planeten \u00f8ker med \u00e5rene.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">For \u00e5 forst\u00e5 det m\u00e5 vi vite forskjellen mellom klima og v\u00e6r. Klima er et langtidsgjennomsnitt, mens v\u00e6r er det vi sjekker n\u00e5r vi skal til stranden i helgen. V\u00e6ret opptrer alts\u00e5 i en midlertidig skala. Vi ser stadig sn\u00f8 om vinteren. Og det skjer en global oppvarming.<\/p>\n<p><center><iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"Klima vs. v\u00e6r | Global Weirding\" width=\"800\" height=\"450\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/nnMJedLHjpY?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><\/center><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">I henhold til <a href=\"https:\/\/medium.com\/thewashingtonpost\/five-myths-about-climate-change-b1aaa81a2c25\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Washington Post<\/a>Siden 2000 har vi sett langt flere&nbsp;<a class=\"bs dd nm nn no np\" href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/capital-weather-gang\/wp\/2013\/06\/26\/warm-temperature-records-dramatically-outpacing-cold-records-in-washington-d-c\/?utm_term=.6fc95fec9167\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">nye varmerekorder<\/a>&nbsp;enn kalde. I 2017 hadde vi faktisk mer enn 10 000&nbsp;<a class=\"bs dd nm nn no np\" href=\"http:\/\/www.guyonclimate.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">nye kulderekorder<\/a>&nbsp;p\u00e5 v\u00e6rstasjoner over hele USA. Og mer enn 36 000 h\u00f8ytemperaturrekorder ble sl\u00e5tt samme \u00e5r.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_10474\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-10474\" style=\"width: 720px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blog.mindthegraph.com\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"wp-image-10474 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.mindthegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/1309_globaltemps_agency_comparison_2018.gif\" alt=\"klimaendringer nasa\" width=\"720\" height=\"400\"><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-10474\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Temperaturdata viser en rask oppvarming de siste ti\u00e5rene, de siste dataene g\u00e5r frem til 2018. If\u00f8lge NASA-data var 2016 det varmeste \u00e5ret siden 1880, og dermed fortsetter den langsiktige trenden med stigende globale temperaturer. De 10 varmeste \u00e5rene i den 139 \u00e5r lange rekorden har alle inntruffet siden 2005, og de fem varmeste \u00e5rene er de fem siste \u00e5rene. Kreditt: NASAs jordobservatorium<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">A <a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41561-019-0400-0.epdf?\">ny artikkel publisert i Nature<\/a>&nbsp;viser hvordan temperatur\u00f8kningen siden slutten av 1900-tallet har v\u00e6rt den raskeste de siste to \u00e5rtusener.<\/p>\n<h2><strong>02. Det er ikke enighet blant forskere om menneskets p\u00e5virkning p\u00e5 klimaendringene.&nbsp;<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">N\u00e5r fornekterne sier at det ikke er vitenskapelig konsensus om klimaendringene, kan mange tro at det er en 50-50-deling om hvordan menneskene p\u00e5virker klimaendringene. Noe s\u00e5nt som \"hver side har sine forskere\". Men 99% av forskerne er enige om at vi for\u00e5rsaker global oppvarming, if\u00f8lge <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/science\/2019\/jul\/24\/scientific-consensus-on-humans-causing-global-warming-passes-99?CMP=twt_a-environment_b-gdneco\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The Guardian<\/a> og <a href=\"https:\/\/climate.nasa.gov\/scientific-consensus\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">NASA<\/a>. Minst 18 vitenskapelige foreninger i USA, fra American Geophysical Union til American Medical Association, har kommet med offisielle uttalelser om klimaendringene. Blant klimaforskere har vi allerede svart p\u00e5 dette sp\u00f8rsm\u00e5let. Vi for\u00e5rsaker dem. N\u00e5 m\u00e5 vi g\u00e5 videre til neste sp\u00f8rsm\u00e5l: Er det mulig \u00e5 stoppe dem?<\/p>\n<h2><strong>03. Det er bare en naturlig syklus. Det har skjedd f\u00f8r.&nbsp;<\/strong><\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Ja, vi har alle sett Ice Age. Og vi vet at planeten Jorden er en gammel sjel som har g\u00e5tt gjennom mye, inkludert ekstreme temperaturer. S\u00e5 de n\u00e5v\u00e6rende klimaendringene kan v\u00e6re en naturlig prosess, ikke sant? Vi lever bare i en ny syklus. Det er mulig, men det er IKKE det de nyeste vitenskapelige dataene viser.<\/p>\n<h3 style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>La oss sjekke mulige naturlige \u00e5rsaker til de \u00f8kende temperaturene:<\/strong><\/h3>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Solen:<\/strong>&nbsp; Energien fra solen har&nbsp;<a class=\"bs dd nm nn no np\" href=\"https:\/\/www.skepticalscience.com\/solar-activity-sunspots-global-warming.htm\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">har g\u00e5tt&nbsp;<\/a>ned, ikke opp, s\u00e5 hvis endringer i solenergien drev temperaturen v\u00e5r, burde vi ha blitt kj\u00f8ligere, ikke varmere.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>F\u00f8r istiden: <\/strong>Noen sier at planeten er varmere fordi vi er i ferd med \u00e5 komme oss etter den siste istiden. Men det som for\u00e5rsaker disse istidene, er jordens banesykluser. Og if\u00f8lge v\u00e5r planetsykluskalender<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/ngeo1358\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"> vi skal visstnok inn i en ny istid<\/a>ikke en varm en.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><strong>Vulkanisme:&nbsp;<\/strong>Vulkaner produserer varmefangende gasser, s\u00e5 de kan vel v\u00e6re ansvarlige for temperaturendringene? Faktisk produserer de mindre enn 1% av den CO2 som menneskene produserer. N\u00e5r store utbrudd skjer, kj\u00f8ler de dessuten ned jorden i stedet for \u00e5 varme den opp. Nature-artikkelen med tittelen&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41561-019-0402-y.epdf?referrer_access_token=NsmsvMEmWm6SoIVKCTcEt9RgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0MyBnoX34ZRaon0wmYjK2GXR3LOpEGlJAGIl2yZr9fKQYQkJni28mFZ38_k7tJ5vkJDciMdvmfN_MId2508iWfSpShftbeoK2cY-NpTXIO-SkgjBJJBVOz_OlG4EcQUBuq1YuGeTaVZ9zND91dE_ap7Om7rfyUcIwvYWGEqN12MEN2JrF6V_Tgkq14lTQX_Z0ft7W5TbcMDh8tS8823jWdGooSvS90xoQ30TVgF2fLu0sLNUZ7M5IdM_98hjl53eUZX85rxKMQv1pmpBc7Gl4RCqw_rtGdPCwNq9Mi_ECopCi6G4JUrqOk_73ejPNW6IGE%3D&amp;tracking_referrer=www.mindthegraph.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Siste fase av den lille istid tvunget frem av vulkanutbrudd<\/a>&nbsp;forklare hvordan verden gikk fra et vulkansk avkj\u00f8lt klima til et klima som ble varmet opp av menneskelige utslipp i l\u00f8pet av 1700-tallet.<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/templates\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-10475 size-large\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.mindthegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/greenhouse-image-1-1024x943.png\" alt=\"preview_88004-1024x943\" width=\"640\" height=\"589\" srcset=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/greenhouse-image-1.png 1024w, https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/greenhouse-image-1-300x276.png 300w, https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/greenhouse-image-1-768x707.png 768w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 640px) 100vw, 640px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">Det finnes faktisk&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.nature.com\/articles\/s41586-019-1401-2.epdf?referrer_access_token=eSxmUpIl3PCVr9z9B-uQONRgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0OFAuvUf3smNPgQh_x6w3tkX-JXRoLf0zBLgBVwxe-KoifRXttIDrQhrrp5_VtNZW2aWM2B673VXec5tmT2AV5TfK-obK6R4EwVqorcNs0p3XR7sKS4MgC2Am9TtwfB8mtEFAlGvQAa-_oYCqo5YZTToEiJ_j61ob5j4HErGyOxjp3TMClkhY2m8CgwnNLW_rl7ctGLlwyONosojhdTgsbGCetHala0Dvo4q1sGW3ZnY39t8ymDta83jcdsfVrY8KArjDUwZMxB5sEIc_Xud66eV_ok9lRGm6bTFM6plSLkDj3NSoXpOZdw8H_2uEOIov8%3D&amp;tracking_referrer=www.mindthegraph.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Ingen bevis for globalt sammenhengende varme- og kuldeperioder i den f\u00f8rindustrielle fellestiden<\/a>. Tidligere skjedde det ikke temperaturendringer p\u00e5 mer enn halvparten av kloden p\u00e5 en gang. F\u00f8rst etter den industrielle revolusjonen begynte temperaturen \u00e5 endre seg globalt. Artikkelen viser hvordan&nbsp;<em>\u201cThis lack of spatiotemporal coherence indicates that preindustrial forcing was not sufficient to produce globally extreme temperatures at multidecadal and centennial timescales. By contrast, we find that the warmest period of the past two millennia occurred during the 2oth century for more than 98% of the globe. This provides strong evidence that anthropogenic global warming is not only unparalleled in terms of absolute temperatures, but also unprecedented in spatial consistency within the context of the past 2,000 years.\u201d<\/em><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\">We need to communicate these results so they can impact our society. Let&#8217;s improve communication in science together?<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"aligncenter wp-image-6577\" src=\"https:\/\/blog.mindthegraph.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/start_get-mind-the-graph-medical-illustrations.png\" alt=\"tenk p\u00e5 grafen vitenskapelige illustrasjoner\" width=\"200\" height=\"65\" srcset=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/start_get-mind-the-graph-medical-illustrations.png 310w, https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/start_get-mind-the-graph-medical-illustrations-300x97.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 200px) 100vw, 200px\" \/><\/a><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Klimaendringer er fortsatt et kontroversielt tema. Noen ganger forsvinner vitenskapelige bevis til fordel for personlige meninger og polemiske samtaler. Vi mener at enhver diskusjon om klimaendringer m\u00e5 baseres p\u00e5 det vi allerede vet som samfunn, basert p\u00e5 vitenskap. Derfor inneholder dette innlegget mange lenker til vitenskapelige artikler, intervjuer med forskere og solide data. Hvis du har noen [...]<\/p>","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":10478,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"image","meta":[],"categories":[959,28],"tags":[219,161,554,250,218,775],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v19.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Demystifying Climate Change Through Scientific Data - Mind the Graph Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Climate change is still a controversial subject. Check out the newest scientific data about it to understand the problem\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/klimaendringer-vitenskapelige-data\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"nb_NO\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Demystifying Climate Change Through Scientific Data - Mind the Graph Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Climate change is still a controversial subject. Check out the newest scientific data about it to understand the problem\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/klimaendringer-vitenskapelige-data\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mind the Graph Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2019-09-30T17:01:52+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2024-06-25T13:49:42+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/cover-climate.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"724\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"392\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Fabiola Soares\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Fabiola Soares\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"5 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Demystifying Climate Change Through Scientific Data - Mind the Graph Blog","description":"Climate change is still a controversial subject. Check out the newest scientific data about it to understand the problem","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/klimaendringer-vitenskapelige-data\/","og_locale":"nb_NO","og_type":"article","og_title":"Demystifying Climate Change Through Scientific Data - Mind the Graph Blog","og_description":"Climate change is still a controversial subject. Check out the newest scientific data about it to understand the problem","og_url":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/klimaendringer-vitenskapelige-data\/","og_site_name":"Mind the Graph Blog","article_published_time":"2019-09-30T17:01:52+00:00","article_modified_time":"2024-06-25T13:49:42+00:00","og_image":[{"width":724,"height":392,"url":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/09\/cover-climate.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Fabiola Soares","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Fabiola Soares","Est. reading time":"5 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/climate-change-scientific-data\/","url":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/climate-change-scientific-data\/","name":"Demystifying Climate Change Through Scientific Data - Mind the Graph Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2019-09-30T17:01:52+00:00","dateModified":"2024-06-25T13:49:42+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/5592c012d89648325be9b0f3c3f91132"},"description":"Climate change is still a controversial subject. Check out the newest scientific data about it to understand the problem","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/climate-change-scientific-data\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"nb-NO","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/climate-change-scientific-data\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/climate-change-scientific-data\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Demystifying Climate Change Through Scientific Data"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/","name":"Mind the Graph Blog","description":"Your science can be beautiful!","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"nb-NO"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/5592c012d89648325be9b0f3c3f91132","name":"Fabiola Soares","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"nb-NO","@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7dca2c6a766aff1db898cc74c18284d8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/7dca2c6a766aff1db898cc74c18284d8?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Fabiola Soares"},"url":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/author\/fabiola\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10466"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10466"}],"version-history":[{"count":13,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10466\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":54770,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10466\/revisions\/54770"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/10478"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10466"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10466"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/nb\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10466"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}