{"id":28853,"date":"2023-08-10T08:33:19","date_gmt":"2023-08-10T11:33:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/inductive-vs-deductive-research-copy\/"},"modified":"2023-08-29T08:35:10","modified_gmt":"2023-08-29T11:35:10","slug":"single-blind-review","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/lt\/vienkartine-akloji-perziura\/","title":{"rendered":"Vienos aklos per\u017ei\u016bros vaidmuo mokslini\u0173 tyrim\u0173 dokumentuose"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Ar kada nors dom\u0117jot\u0117s, kaip per\u017ei\u016brimi mokslini\u0173 tyrim\u0173 dokumentai? Tai labai svarbi u\u017eduotis, nes ji apima faktin\u0119 informacij\u0105, kuri turi b\u016bti tinkamai patikrinta ir per\u017ei\u016br\u0117ta. Vienas i\u0161 da\u017eniausiai naudojam\u0173 metod\u0173 yra vadinamas <strong>Vienos aklos akies ap\u017evalga<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0160io proceso metu autoriai pateikia savo darbus, ta\u010diau recenzentai neatskleid\u017eia j\u0173 tapatyb\u0117s. Kita vertus, recenzentai \u017eino, kas yra autoriai. Tai \u0161iek tiek pana\u0161u \u012f vienpus\u012f veidrod\u012f, kai autoriai nemato recenzent\u0173, bet recenzentai mato juos.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Visa \u0161i sistema sukurta siekiant u\u017etikrinti, kad darbai b\u016bt\u0173 vertinami s\u0105\u017einingai ir ne\u0161ali\u0161kai. \u0160iame straipsnyje pasinersime \u012f<strong> vienkartin\u0117 akla ap\u017evalga<\/strong>, i\u0161nagrin\u0117kite, kaip jis veikia, kokie jo privalumai ir tr\u016bkumai ir kod\u0117l jis yra svarbi mokslinio proceso dalis.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-what-is-a-single-blind-review\">Kas yra vienkartin\u0117 akla per\u017ei\u016bra?<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Viena akla per\u017ei\u016bra - tai akademin\u0117se ir mokslo bendruomen\u0117se taikomas metodas, kuriuo siekiama \u012fvertinti paskelbti pateikt\u0173 mokslini\u0173 straipsni\u0173 kokyb\u0119 ir pagr\u012fstum\u0105. \u0160io proceso metu recenzentai \u017eino autori\u0173 tapatyb\u0119 ir priklausomyb\u0119, o autoriai ne\u017eino recenzent\u0173 tapatyb\u0117s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Atliekant vienpus\u012f akl\u0105 recenzavim\u0105, recenzent\u0173 anonimi\u0161kumas leid\u017eia ne\u0161ali\u0161kai ir objektyviai \u012fvertinti tyrimo turin\u012f. Tai padeda i\u0161vengti bet kokio galimo \u0161ali\u0161kumo, kuris gali atsirasti d\u0117l toki\u0173 veiksni\u0173, kaip autori\u0173 reputacija, akademin\u0117 kilm\u0117 ar institucin\u0117 priklausomyb\u0117. Recenzentai gali sutelkti d\u0117mes\u012f tik \u012f tyrimo privalumus, \u012fskaitant jo metodik\u0105, rezultatus ir i\u0161vadas, nedarydami \u012ftakos asmeniniams veiksniams.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0160is per\u017ei\u016bros procesas skatina teisingum\u0105 ir s\u0105\u017einingum\u0105 vertinant mokslin\u012f darb\u0105. Jis u\u017etikrina, kad sprendimas priimti arba atmesti darb\u0105 pirmiausia b\u016bt\u0173 grind\u017eiamas mokslini\u0173 tyrim\u0173 kokybe, grie\u017etumu ir reik\u0161mingumu, o ne autori\u0173 reputacija ar ry\u0161iais. I\u0161laikant recenzent\u0173 tapatyb\u0117s konfidencialum\u0105, vieninteliu aklu recenzavimu sudaromos vienodos s\u0105lygos visiems autoriams, nepriklausomai nuo j\u0173 kilm\u0117s ar ry\u0161i\u0173.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-advantages-of-single-blind-review\">Vienkartin\u0117s aklos per\u017ei\u016bros privalumai<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Vienkartinis aklas recenzavimas turi kelet\u0105 privalum\u0173 vertinant mokslinius straipsnius ir i\u0161laikant autori\u0173 anonimi\u0161kum\u0105.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0160ie privalumai padeda grie\u017etai ir patikimai vertinti mokslini\u0173 tyrim\u0173 darbus, skatina akademin\u0119 kompetencij\u0105 ir mokslo pa\u017eang\u0105.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Du pagrindiniai aklos per\u017ei\u016bros privalumai yra objektyvumas ir konfidencialumas.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-objectivity\">Objektyvumas<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Vienkartin\u0117s aklos per\u017ei\u016bros tikslai yra \u0161ie:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol>\n<li>Ne\u0161ali\u0161kumo u\u017etikrinimas<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>S\u0105\u017einingumo ir lygi\u0173 galimybi\u0173 skatinimas<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Kokyb\u0117s ir grie\u017etumo didinimas<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Autori\u0173 \u0161ali\u0161kumo ma\u017einimas<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Konstruktyvaus gr\u012f\u017etamojo ry\u0161io palengvinimas<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-confidentiality\">Konfidencialumas<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Konfidencialumas yra labai svarbus vienos aklos per\u017ei\u016bros aspektas. Procesas yra sukurtas taip, kad b\u016bt\u0173 u\u017etikrintas tiek autori\u0173, tiek recenzent\u0173 konfidencialumas. \u0160tai kaip u\u017etikrinamas konfidencialumas atliekant vien\u0105 akl\u0105 per\u017ei\u016br\u0105:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol>\n<li>Autoriaus tapatyb\u0117<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Recenzent\u0173 tapatyb\u0117<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Recenzent\u0173 diskusijos<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Leidybos sprendimai<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Duomenys ir i\u0161vados<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-disadvantages-of-single-blind-review\">Vienos aklos per\u017ei\u016bros tr\u016bkumai<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>\u0160ali\u0161kas sprendim\u0173 pri\u0117mimas gali b\u016bti potencialus vienintelio aklo per\u017ei\u016bros proceso tr\u016bkumas. Nepaisant pastang\u0173 i\u0161laikyti ne\u0161ali\u0161kum\u0105, yra veiksni\u0173, d\u0117l kuri\u0173 vertinimai gali b\u016bti \u0161ali\u0161ki:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul>\n<li>Vienakryptis recenzavimas - tai recenzavimo procesas, kai recenzento tapatyb\u0117 slepiama nuo recenzuojamo dokumento autoriaus, ta\u010diau autoriaus tapatyb\u0117 \u017einoma recenzentui. Ta\u010diau net ir esant tokiam anonimi\u0161kumui vis tiek i\u0161lieka \u0161ali\u0161ko sprendim\u0173 pri\u0117mimo galimyb\u0117.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Vienas i\u0161 galim\u0173 \u0161ali\u0161kumo \u0161altini\u0173 atliekant vienaklases ap\u017evalgas yra nes\u0105moningas \u0161ali\u0161kumas. Recenzentai gali b\u016bti nes\u0105moningai \u0161ali\u0161ki d\u0117l autoriaus lyties, ras\u0117s, institucin\u0117s priklausomyb\u0117s ar kit\u0173 veiksni\u0173, nesusijusi\u0173 su tyrimo kokybe. \u0160ie i\u0161ankstiniai nusistatymai gali tur\u0117ti \u012ftakos recenzento atliekamam darbo vertinimui ir lemti neobjektyv\u0173 sprendim\u0105.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Kitas galimas \u0161ali\u0161kumo \u0161altinis yra asmeniniai recenzento \u012fsitikinimai ir pageidavimai. Recenzentai gali tur\u0117ti tam tikr\u0173 \u012fsitikinim\u0173 ar preferencij\u0173, kurie daro \u012ftak\u0105 j\u0173 darbo vertinimui. Pavyzd\u017eiui, recenzentas, kuris yra tvirtai \u012fsipareigoj\u0119s tam tikrai teorijai ar metodologijai, gali kriti\u0161kiau vertinti dokument\u0105, kuriame taikomas kitoks po\u017ei\u016bris.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li>Kita problema, susijusi su vieninteliu aklu recenzavimu, yra ta, kad autoriai gali negal\u0117ti visi\u0161kai suprasti recenzento pastab\u0173 ir kritikos ar j\u0173 gin\u010dyti. Taip yra tod\u0117l, kad jie ne\u017eino recenzento tapatyb\u0117s, tod\u0117l negali su juo tiesiogiai aptarti atsiliepim\u0173 ar pra\u0161yti papildom\u0173 paai\u0161kinim\u0173. D\u0117l tokio skaidrumo tr\u016bkumo autoriams gali b\u016bti sunku patobulinti savo darbus ir gali kilti nusivylimas ir pasipiktinimas.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-alternatives-to-single-blind-review\">Vienkartin\u0117s aklos per\u017ei\u016bros alternatyvos<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Dvi alternatyvos, galin\u010dios atlikti \"Single Blind Review\" vaidmen\u012f, yra \u0161ios:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h3 id=\"h-double-blind-review\">Dvigubai akla ap\u017evalga<\/h3>\n\n\n\n<p>Dvigubai aklas recenzavimas - tai recenzavimo procesas, kai autori\u0173 ir recenzent\u0173 tapatyb\u0117s yra slepiamos. Tai rei\u0161kia, kad autoriai ne\u017eino, kas recenzavo j\u0173 darb\u0105, o recenzentai ne\u017eino autori\u0173, kuri\u0173 darbus jie vertina, tapatyb\u0117s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Atliekant dvigubai akl\u0105 per\u017ei\u016br\u0105, autoriai paprastai pateikia savo darbus su tituliniu puslapiu, kuriame nenurodoma jokia juos identifikuojanti informacija, pvz., j\u0173 vardai, pavard\u0117s, filialai ar kontaktiniai duomenys. Tada \u017eurnalo ar konferencijos organizatoriai perduoda rankra\u0161t\u012f recenzentams, kurie vertina darb\u0105 ne\u017einodami autori\u0173 tapatyb\u0117s.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Dvigubai aklo recenzavimo tikslas - suma\u017einti \u0161ali\u0161kum\u0105 ir galimus interes\u0173 konfliktus, kurie gali kilti, kai recenzentams \u017einoma autori\u0173 tapatyb\u0117. Dvigubai aklu recenzavimu siekiama u\u017etikrinti, kad darbai b\u016bt\u0173 vertinami tik pagal j\u0173 mokslin\u0119 vert\u0119, o ne pagal autori\u0173 reputacij\u0105, priklausomyb\u0119 ar asmenines savybes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-open-peer-review\">Atviras tarpusavio vertinimas<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/what-is-a-peer-reviewed-article\/\">Atviras tarpusavio vertinimas<\/a> tai recenzavimo procesas, kurio metu autori\u0173 ir recenzent\u0173 tapatyb\u0117s yra \u017einomos, taip skatinant mokslini\u0173 tyrim\u0173 darb\u0173 vertinimo skaidrum\u0105 ir atvirum\u0105. Atviro recenzavimo metu panaikinamas tradicinis anoniminis recenzavimo pob\u016bdis, o recenzent\u0173 vardai ir pavard\u0117s atskleid\u017eiami kartu su paskelbtu dokumentu.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Atviro recenzavimo metu autoriai pateikia savo rankra\u0161\u010dius, o recenzent\u0173 tapatyb\u0117 autoriams yra \u017einoma. Toks skaidrumas leid\u017eia autoriams ir recenzentams tiesiogiai bendrauti recenzavimo proceso metu, palengvina konstruktyv\u0173 dialog\u0105 ir padeda i\u0161siai\u0161kinti visus r\u016bpimus klausimus ar pasi\u016blymus.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-software-for-single-blind-review\">Programin\u0117 \u012franga, skirta vienai aklai per\u017ei\u016brai<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Yra kelios programin\u0117s \u012frangos platformos, kurios gali palengvinti vienkartin\u012f akl\u0105 mokslini\u0173 tyrim\u0173 dokument\u0173 per\u017ei\u016bros proces\u0105. \u0160tai keletas pavyzd\u017ei\u0173:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol>\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.openconf.com\"><strong>\"OpenConf\"<\/strong><\/a><strong>:<\/strong> \"OpenConf\" yra konferencij\u0173 valdymo sistema, kuri palaiko vienkartin\u0119 akl\u0105 per\u017ei\u016br\u0105. Ji leid\u017eia autoriams pateikti savo prane\u0161imus ir sekti recenzavimo eig\u0105. Sistema u\u017etikrina anonimi\u0161kum\u0105, nes vertinimo proceso metu nuo recenzent\u0173 paslepia autori\u0173 informacij\u0105.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/easychair.org\"><strong>EasyChair<\/strong><\/a><strong>:<\/strong> \"EasyChair\" yra populiari konferencij\u0173 valdymo programin\u0117 \u012franga, kurioje si\u016blomos vienos aklos per\u017ei\u016bros funkcijos. Ji leid\u017eia autoriams pateikti savo prane\u0161imus ir suteikia platform\u0105 recenzentams vertinti prane\u0161imus. Siekiant i\u0161laikyti konfidencialum\u0105, \"EasyChair\" leid\u017eia anonimi\u0161kai bendrauti autoriams ir recenzentams.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/clarivate.com\/products\/scientific-and-academic-research\/research-publishing-solutions\/scholarone\/\"><strong>ScholarOne rankra\u0161\u010diai<\/strong><\/a><strong>:<\/strong> \"ScholarOne Manuscripts\" yra i\u0161sami pateikimo ir tarpusavio vertinimo valdymo sistema, kuri\u0105 naudoja daugelis mokslini\u0173 \u017eurnal\u0173. Ji palaiko vienkartin\u012f akl\u0105 recenzavim\u0105, leisdama autoriams pateikti savo straipsnius ir suteikdama saugi\u0105 platform\u0105 recenzentams, kad jie gal\u0117t\u0173 vertinti straipsnius, i\u0161laikydami anonimi\u0161kum\u0105.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/openjournalsystems.com\"><strong>OJS (Open Journal Systems)<\/strong><\/a><strong>:<\/strong> OJS yra atvirojo kodo programin\u0117s \u012frangos platforma, pla\u010diai naudojama akademiniams \u017eurnalams tvarkyti. Ji si\u016blo vienkartinio aklo recenzavimo galimybes, leid\u017eia autoriams pateikti savo straipsnius ir palengvina recenzavimo proces\u0105 anoniminio recenzavimo funkcijomis.<\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/www.exordo.com\"><strong>Ex Ordo<\/strong><\/a><strong>:<\/strong> \"Ex Ordo\" yra konferencij\u0173 valdymo sistema, kuri palaiko vienkartines aklas per\u017ei\u016bras. Ji leid\u017eia autoriams pateikti savo prane\u0161imus, o recenzentams suteikia patogi\u0105 s\u0105saj\u0105, leid\u017eian\u010di\u0105 anonimi\u0161kai vertinti prane\u0161imus.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\n\n\n<h2 id=\"h-add-visual-impact-to-your-posters-with-scientific-illustrations-and-graphics\">Suteikite savo plakatams vizualin\u012f poveik\u012f naudodami mokslines iliustracijas ir grafik\u0105<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>Kaip jaustum\u0117t\u0117s, jei gautum\u0117te galimyb\u0119 supaprastinti savo tyrim\u0105 ir ai\u0161kiai paai\u0161kinti j\u012f auditorijai? Vaizdin\u0117 med\u017eiaga padeda sud\u0117tingas mokslini\u0173 tyrim\u0173 temas suskaidyti \u012f lengvai suprantamas s\u0105vokas. <a href=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Mind the Graph<\/a> padeda suteikti plakatams vizualin\u012f poveik\u012f mokslin\u0117mis iliustracijomis ir grafika. U\u017esiregistruokite dabar!&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:21px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full\"><a href=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" src=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/10\/r3qiu0qenda-3.gif\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-25130\"\/><\/a><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n<div style=\"height:21px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button aligncenter\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link has-background wp-element-button\" href=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/\" style=\"border-radius:50px;background-color:#dc1866\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">Prad\u0117kite kurti su Mind the Graph<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:44px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Su\u017einokite, kokie yra vienintelio aklo vertinimo privalumai ir kaip jis padeda sukurti ne\u0161ali\u0161k\u0105 ir skaidr\u0173 mokslini\u0173 tyrim\u0173 darb\u0173 vertinimo proces\u0105.<\/p>","protected":false},"author":33,"featured_media":28855,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[959,28],"tags":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v19.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>The Role of Single-Blind Review in Research Papers - Mind the Graph Blog<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Learn the advantages of single-blind review, and how it helps create an unbiased and transparent evaluation process for research papers.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/lt\/ein-blind-review\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"lt_LT\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Role of Single-Blind Review in Research Papers\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Learn the advantages of single-blind review, and how it helps create an unbiased and transparent evaluation process for research papers.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/lt\/ein-blind-review\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Mind the Graph Blog\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-08-10T11:33:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-08-29T11:35:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/single-blind-review-blog.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1123\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"612\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Sowjanya Pedada\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"The Role of Single-Blind Review in Research Papers\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"Learn the advantages of single-blind review, and how it helps create an unbiased and transparent evaluation process for research papers.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/single-blind-review-blog.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Sowjanya Pedada\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Role of Single-Blind Review in Research Papers - Mind the Graph Blog","description":"Learn the advantages of single-blind review, and how it helps create an unbiased and transparent evaluation process for research papers.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/lt\/ein-blind-review\/","og_locale":"lt_LT","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Role of Single-Blind Review in Research Papers","og_description":"Learn the advantages of single-blind review, and how it helps create an unbiased and transparent evaluation process for research papers.","og_url":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/lt\/ein-blind-review\/","og_site_name":"Mind the Graph Blog","article_published_time":"2023-08-10T11:33:19+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-08-29T11:35:10+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1123,"height":612,"url":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/single-blind-review-blog.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Sowjanya Pedada","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_title":"The Role of Single-Blind Review in Research Papers","twitter_description":"Learn the advantages of single-blind review, and how it helps create an unbiased and transparent evaluation process for research papers.","twitter_image":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/08\/single-blind-review-blog.jpg","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Sowjanya Pedada","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/de\/ein-blind-review\/","url":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/de\/ein-blind-review\/","name":"The Role of Single-Blind Review in Research Papers - Mind the Graph Blog","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2023-08-10T11:33:19+00:00","dateModified":"2023-08-29T11:35:10+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/1809367ac22d998ef1780e61c942bd9e"},"description":"Learn the advantages of single-blind review, and how it helps create an unbiased and transparent evaluation process for research papers.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/de\/ein-blind-review\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"lt-LT","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/de\/ein-blind-review\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/de\/ein-blind-review\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Role of Single-Blind Review in Research Papers"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/","name":"Mind the Graph Blog","description":"Your science can be beautiful!","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":"required name=search_term_string"}],"inLanguage":"lt-LT"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/1809367ac22d998ef1780e61c942bd9e","name":"Sowjanya Pedada","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"lt-LT","@id":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5498cb1111b92c813c76ae76ad5b1dd3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/5498cb1111b92c813c76ae76ad5b1dd3?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Sowjanya Pedada"},"description":"Sowjanya is a passionate writer and an avid reader. She holds MBA in Agribusiness Management and now is working as a content writer. She loves to play with words and hopes to make a difference in the world through her writings. Apart from writing, she is interested in reading fiction novels and doing craftwork. She also loves to travel and explore different cuisines and spend time with her family and friends.","url":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/lt\/author\/sowjanya\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/lt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28853"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/lt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/lt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/lt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/33"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/lt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=28853"}],"version-history":[{"count":7,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/lt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28853\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":29251,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/lt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28853\/revisions\/29251"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/lt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/28855"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/lt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=28853"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/lt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=28853"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/mindthegraph.com\/blog\/lt\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=28853"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}